The Individual Experience in a World of Categories :: Sociology Sociological Essays

The Individual Experience in a World of Categories Lakoff and Johnson contend for an encapsulated mind, saying that our classifications depend on how we experience the world through our bodies. As indicated by this hypothesis, because of their various life systems, people would encounter the world contrastingly and their classifications would be naturally extraordinary. Additionally, it would be normal that all ladies would have similar classifications. Our class and our conversations have shown an assorted variety of assessments and techniques for classification that invalidate this piece of Lakoff and Johnson's contention. I believe that Lakoff and Johnson were right in saying that the classes we structure are a piece of our experience (Lakoff and Johnson 19). In any case, what they fail to factor into their investigation of the manner in which people order is the distinctions of every individual experience. Classes and their implications depend on a person's very own insight into the world, and that is the reason no classification implies the very same thing for more than one person. I need to look at the classifications of race and sexuality in Moraga and Delany to exhibit the essentialness of the individual experience and its immediate association with classifications. Likewise, I need to propose that race as other is more hazardous than sexuality to one's very own personality. Delany's Repugnance/Perversion/Diversion presents us with a progression of upsetting stories. They all start inside Delany's life, however his explanation behind picking these specific stories is definitely in light of the fact that they are strange (Delany 125). Indeed, even inside one's own individual experience, there is a uniqueness to occasions. The class gay doesn't imply that the people who distinguish themselves as a component of it will share a comprehension of all that it has intended for one individual to guarantee this mark for himself/herself. Delany recognizes that the ID with others that classifications make is in a manner bogus, even the similitudes are at long last, to the degree they are living ones, a play of contrasts (Delany 131). He underlines that a significant part of the sexual experience stays outside of language. No everything will be shared, not all things can be. A person's excursion to asserting his/her own character is settled in the individual excursio n, in events both trademark and strange. In any case, perhaps these strange stories are not as unique to his experience as Delany accepts. It is certainty that they are in reality a piece of Delany's understanding as a gay man, and he says himself that there is no all inclusive gay experience.